<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steal This Niche &#8211; For the Shortys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michellemacphearson.com/steal-this-niche-for-the-shortys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/steal-this-niche-for-the-shortys/</link>
	<description>The Internet Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 18:56:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Elle</title>
		<link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/steal-this-niche-for-the-shortys/#comment-12473</link>
		<dc:creator>Elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michellemacphearson.com/?p=591#comment-12473</guid>
		<description>Hi Michelle,

I&#039;ve read your blog several times, but this was the first time I have actually watched a video- it was fantastic. I love that you are so down to earth and real.. and provide a true service.

I &#039;ve used nichebot in the past (Market Samouri looks awesome). Its very cool to see how you get all your data and exactly how much is provided. Great tips- thanks so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michelle,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read your blog several times, but this was the first time I have actually watched a video- it was fantastic. I love that you are so down to earth and real.. and provide a true service.</p>
<p>I &#8216;ve used nichebot in the past (Market Samouri looks awesome). Its very cool to see how you get all your data and exactly how much is provided. Great tips- thanks so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa Pagan</title>
		<link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/steal-this-niche-for-the-shortys/#comment-12323</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa Pagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michellemacphearson.com/?p=591#comment-12323</guid>
		<description>Great run down, kinda spooky I did this exact market research with that offer and MS 2 weeks ago and came away with a handful of prime keywords. I haven&#039;t done anything with that data, but now that I&#039;ve watched you do what I&#039;ve filed away as a good affiliate offer and keywords,  I feel a fire under me to get moving!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great run down, kinda spooky I did this exact market research with that offer and MS 2 weeks ago and came away with a handful of prime keywords. I haven&#8217;t done anything with that data, but now that I&#8217;ve watched you do what I&#8217;ve filed away as a good affiliate offer and keywords,  I feel a fire under me to get moving!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/steal-this-niche-for-the-shortys/#comment-12257</link>
		<dc:creator>oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 04:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michellemacphearson.com/?p=591#comment-12257</guid>
		<description>well i am doing organic for now havent quite got in to adwords mainly budget reasons...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well i am doing organic for now havent quite got in to adwords mainly budget reasons&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle MacPhearson</title>
		<link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/steal-this-niche-for-the-shortys/#comment-12246</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle MacPhearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 20:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michellemacphearson.com/?p=591#comment-12246</guid>
		<description>@Rob - Domain age is a factor - an older domain tends to be more trusts.  I don&#039;t know of an algorithm that takes into account old domain/no links kind of thing.  It&#039;s VERY possible to rank against an old domain - just build more links.  If they have none, and you have 10, you&#039;re doing 10x better than them.

Just like the presence of title tags, domain age is just one of many factors that are considered in rank.  It&#039;s not the end all be all, and can easily be overcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rob &#8211; Domain age is a factor &#8211; an older domain tends to be more trusts.  I don&#8217;t know of an algorithm that takes into account old domain/no links kind of thing.  It&#8217;s VERY possible to rank against an old domain &#8211; just build more links.  If they have none, and you have 10, you&#8217;re doing 10x better than them.</p>
<p>Just like the presence of title tags, domain age is just one of many factors that are considered in rank.  It&#8217;s not the end all be all, and can easily be overcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/steal-this-niche-for-the-shortys/#comment-12245</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 20:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michellemacphearson.com/?p=591#comment-12245</guid>
		<description>Dear Michelle,

Wow! Thanks for answering my question. That&#039;s what I call responsive!

I do have another quite important question ... if you feel it&#039;s irrelevant then feel free to delete it and I won&#039;t be offended I promise ...

The question is: when search engines rank a site, how does the age of the domain relate to the number of backlinks? eg if a site has been there for four years but has no backlinks, how strong is that domain compared with a four-month-old site with 500 backlinks? Is there any &quot;rule of thumb&quot; calculation of the relative value of backlinks versus (say) a year&#039;s maturity on a website? 

More bluntly ... can one use backlinks on a new site to send it up the search results to displace a mature site that lacks backlinks? And if so, how would you know roughly how many backlinks equals one year of the mature site (and of what PR)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Michelle,</p>
<p>Wow! Thanks for answering my question. That&#8217;s what I call responsive!</p>
<p>I do have another quite important question &#8230; if you feel it&#8217;s irrelevant then feel free to delete it and I won&#8217;t be offended I promise &#8230;</p>
<p>The question is: when search engines rank a site, how does the age of the domain relate to the number of backlinks? eg if a site has been there for four years but has no backlinks, how strong is that domain compared with a four-month-old site with 500 backlinks? Is there any &#8220;rule of thumb&#8221; calculation of the relative value of backlinks versus (say) a year&#8217;s maturity on a website? </p>
<p>More bluntly &#8230; can one use backlinks on a new site to send it up the search results to displace a mature site that lacks backlinks? And if so, how would you know roughly how many backlinks equals one year of the mature site (and of what PR)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle MacPhearson</title>
		<link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/steal-this-niche-for-the-shortys/#comment-12244</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle MacPhearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 20:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michellemacphearson.com/?p=591#comment-12244</guid>
		<description>@Jason - SEO - if I were using Adwords, the KW research process would be quite a bit different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jason &#8211; SEO &#8211; if I were using Adwords, the KW research process would be quite a bit different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/steal-this-niche-for-the-shortys/#comment-12243</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michellemacphearson.com/?p=591#comment-12243</guid>
		<description>Michelle,

Out of curiosity, when you market your clickbank offer, are you using adwords, or organic search to rank in Google?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle,</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, when you market your clickbank offer, are you using adwords, or organic search to rank in Google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/steal-this-niche-for-the-shortys/#comment-12217</link>
		<dc:creator>oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 17:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michellemacphearson.com/?p=591#comment-12217</guid>
		<description>hello michelle,
let me start off saying that i am a noob but i have a couple of sites up but they are producing min. traffic so that equals min.gain... i am so happy to see someone that takes out all the fluff in this affiliate marketing game it is definately refreshing to see... i will be implementing your social media daily blueprint immediately, but let me ask you how much of it do you outsource nd how much of it do you actually do yourself...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello michelle,<br />
let me start off saying that i am a noob but i have a couple of sites up but they are producing min. traffic so that equals min.gain&#8230; i am so happy to see someone that takes out all the fluff in this affiliate marketing game it is definately refreshing to see&#8230; i will be implementing your social media daily blueprint immediately, but let me ask you how much of it do you outsource nd how much of it do you actually do yourself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle MacPhearson</title>
		<link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/steal-this-niche-for-the-shortys/#comment-12191</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle MacPhearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 03:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michellemacphearson.com/?p=591#comment-12191</guid>
		<description>@Rob - Checking competition in quotes gives you an idea of how many sites out there are actually optimized for the term you&#039;re looking at - rather than just how many sites out there have the words: how to get taller on them, somewhere, not necessarily in that order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rob &#8211; Checking competition in quotes gives you an idea of how many sites out there are actually optimized for the term you&#8217;re looking at &#8211; rather than just how many sites out there have the words: how to get taller on them, somewhere, not necessarily in that order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.michellemacphearson.com/steal-this-niche-for-the-shortys/#comment-12163</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 11:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michellemacphearson.com/?p=591#comment-12163</guid>
		<description>hi Michelle nice video 
but I am totally confused when I enter the search term &quot;how to get taller&quot; into google it shows 17,300,000 competition.Now when i enter the same search term in &quot;quotes&quot;  I get 57,300 But what percentage of people seach using quotes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Michelle nice video<br />
but I am totally confused when I enter the search term &#8220;how to get taller&#8221; into google it shows 17,300,000 competition.Now when i enter the same search term in &#8220;quotes&#8221;  I get 57,300 But what percentage of people seach using quotes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 10/20 queries in 0.034 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 578/587 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.michellemacphearson.com @ 2012-02-10 21:02:34 -->
